Has anyone else been able to successfully apply this patch to the trunk and build?
I had some errors applying and the patch seems to reference some methods that don't exist e.g. ConcatUriManaget.ConcatData.getUri which doesn't seem to be part of the patch and is not in trunk. On Sep 29, 2011, at 10:03 AM, Michael Beaver <[email protected]> wrote: > It's applicable to the current trunk, and you should be able to apply it to > fairly recent extracts of trunk as well. > > > > Michael Beaver > IBM Lotus > 919-254-7007 (T/L 444) > > Rob Keane ---09/29/2011 09:33:11 AM---Is the 3.0 patch meant to be applied to > a tag? A point in time on the trunk? Thanks! > > > From: > > Rob Keane <[email protected]> > > To: > > "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > Cc: > > "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > Date: > > 09/29/2011 09:33 AM > > Subject: > > Re: Inline rendering and 3.0 Release > > > > Is the 3.0 patch meant to be applied to a tag? A point in time on the trunk? > > Thanks! > > > > On Sep 28, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Michael Beaver <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hey, Kevin. I've attached 2 versions of the inline patch to the jira site > > for inline: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1402 > > > > > > We're currently developing the mixin approach (inline.patch) but for > > completeness I also included the original approach that was ported from the > > 2.0.2 version (inline-initial-port.patch). > > > > Thanks! > > > > Michael Beaver > > IBM Lotus > > 919-254-7007 (T/L 444) > > > > Rob Keane ---09/23/2011 03:44:03 PM---Very cool, I will be checking that > > out. On Sep 23, 2011, at 3:40 PM, "Dan Dumont" <[email protected] > > > > > > From: > > > > Rob Keane <[email protected]> > > > > To: > > > > "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > > > Date: > > > > 09/23/2011 03:44 PM > > > > Subject: > > > > Re: Inline rendering and 3.0 Release > > > > > > > > Very cool, I will be checking that out. > > > > > > > > On Sep 23, 2011, at 3:40 PM, "Dan Dumont" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > You may also want to consider some work that's been recently committed to > > > allow all views of a gadget to share a reference to a single iframe on > > > the > > > page that code can be loaded in and shared between all instances of that > > > gadget (regardless of view rendering). > > > > > > https://reviews.apache.org/r/1749/ > > > > > > This allows you to leverage the safety of browser sandboxing while also > > > allowing you to keep all of your code in a single, persistent window. > > > This code will be expanded soon in a new feature that allows several > > > gadgets to share in the use of a single shared-script-frame, even when > > > rendering with locked domains. > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Rob Keane <[email protected]> > > > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, > > > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > > Date: 09/23/2011 03:36 PM > > > Subject: Re: Inline rendering and 3.0 Release > > > > > > > > > > > > Excellent! > > > > > > IFrames come with a decent amount of overhead and we'd love to be able to > > > share common libraries and CSS between gadgets without loading them over > > > and over again individually. > > > > > > Those issues have caused some undesirable performance hits on older > > > browsers and hardware. > > > > > > On Sep 23, 2011, at 11:51 AM, Michael Beaver <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> Hi, Rob. > > >> > > >> We're planning on submitting a preview of our inline work early next > > > week to the community and would love to work with you on assessing the > > > approach. There are a number of items we're still working on but feel > > > that it would be beneficial to get some feedback from the community while > > > it's still in progress. The 3.0 approach is different from the inline > > > patch that was based on 2.0.2, and instead operates as a container mixin > > > to avoid massive modification of core container code. The result is a > > > significantly cleaner approach. > > >> > > >> Also, we'd really like to understand what requirements and functionality > > > your company is interested in for rendering gadgets inline, so hopefully > > > this early preview can be used to help drive that discussion. > > >> > > >> > > >> Thanks! > > >> > > >> Michael Beaver > > >> IBM Lotus > > >> 919-254-7007 (T/L 444) > > >> > > >> Rob Keane ---09/22/2011 01:46:18 PM---My company is very interested in > > > inline rendering and the 3.0 release. Will this feature be include > > >> > > >> > > >> From: > > >> > > >> Rob Keane <[email protected]> > > >> > > >> To: > > >> > > >> "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > >> > > >> Date: > > >> > > >> 09/22/2011 01:46 PM > > >> > > >> Subject: > > >> > > >> Inline rendering and 3.0 Release > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> My company is very interested in inline rendering and the 3.0 release. > > >> > > >> Will this feature be included in the release, will it be in a beta > > > release if so? > > >> > > >> Is there any rough timeline for the 3.0 release? > > >> > > >> Apologies if these questions have already been addressed, I was unable > > > to find an answer. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
