Is the 3.0 patch meant to be applied to a tag? A point in time on the trunk?
Thanks! On Sep 28, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Michael Beaver <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey, Kevin. I've attached 2 versions of the inline patch to the jira site > for inline: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1402 > > > We're currently developing the mixin approach (inline.patch) but for > completeness I also included the original approach that was ported from the > 2.0.2 version (inline-initial-port.patch). > > Thanks! > > Michael Beaver > IBM Lotus > 919-254-7007 (T/L 444) > > Rob Keane ---09/23/2011 03:44:03 PM---Very cool, I will be checking that out. > On Sep 23, 2011, at 3:40 PM, "Dan Dumont" <[email protected] > > > From: > > Rob Keane <[email protected]> > > To: > > "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > Date: > > 09/23/2011 03:44 PM > > Subject: > > Re: Inline rendering and 3.0 Release > > > > Very cool, I will be checking that out. > > > > On Sep 23, 2011, at 3:40 PM, "Dan Dumont" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > You may also want to consider some work that's been recently committed to > > allow all views of a gadget to share a reference to a single iframe on the > > page that code can be loaded in and shared between all instances of that > > gadget (regardless of view rendering). > > > > https://reviews.apache.org/r/1749/ > > > > This allows you to leverage the safety of browser sandboxing while also > > allowing you to keep all of your code in a single, persistent window. > > This code will be expanded soon in a new feature that allows several > > gadgets to share in the use of a single shared-script-frame, even when > > rendering with locked domains. > > > > > > > > From: Rob Keane <[email protected]> > > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, > > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > Date: 09/23/2011 03:36 PM > > Subject: Re: Inline rendering and 3.0 Release > > > > > > > > Excellent! > > > > IFrames come with a decent amount of overhead and we'd love to be able to > > share common libraries and CSS between gadgets without loading them over > > and over again individually. > > > > Those issues have caused some undesirable performance hits on older > > browsers and hardware. > > > > On Sep 23, 2011, at 11:51 AM, Michael Beaver <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi, Rob. > >> > >> We're planning on submitting a preview of our inline work early next > > week to the community and would love to work with you on assessing the > > approach. There are a number of items we're still working on but feel > > that it would be beneficial to get some feedback from the community while > > it's still in progress. The 3.0 approach is different from the inline > > patch that was based on 2.0.2, and instead operates as a container mixin > > to avoid massive modification of core container code. The result is a > > significantly cleaner approach. > >> > >> Also, we'd really like to understand what requirements and functionality > > your company is interested in for rendering gadgets inline, so hopefully > > this early preview can be used to help drive that discussion. > >> > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> Michael Beaver > >> IBM Lotus > >> 919-254-7007 (T/L 444) > >> > >> Rob Keane ---09/22/2011 01:46:18 PM---My company is very interested in > > inline rendering and the 3.0 release. Will this feature be include > >> > >> > >> From: > >> > >> Rob Keane <[email protected]> > >> > >> To: > >> > >> "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > >> > >> Date: > >> > >> 09/22/2011 01:46 PM > >> > >> Subject: > >> > >> Inline rendering and 3.0 Release > >> > >> > >> > >> My company is very interested in inline rendering and the 3.0 release. > >> > >> Will this feature be included in the release, will it be in a beta > > release if so? > >> > >> Is there any rough timeline for the 3.0 release? > >> > >> Apologies if these questions have already been addressed, I was unable > > to find an answer. > >> > > > > > > > >
