+1 to:
* NetCDF CF-1.5 to ISO 19115 bindings
- happy to help here, what do you think is the starting point?
- should we connect to the NetCDF-Java library here? If so, I
can help
* Storage in a simple (the most possible straightforward) database
- how about storing it in Apache OODT? http://oodt.apache.org/
That way we could be independent of actual database, and could
leverage Apache Tika perhaps in there.
Let me know what you think thanks dude.
Cheers,
Chris
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: [email protected]
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Desruisseaux <[email protected]>
Organization: Geomatys
Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 9:30 AM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Would like to replace servlet-api dependency by javaee-api
>Hello all
>
>Le 17/04/13 18:04, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) a écrit :
>> +1 to <scoped>provided</scope>, the Java EE
>> dependency can be provided by Apache Geronimo.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
>I think that provided scope is the usual practice.
>
>Sorry for being silent lately. The commits are temporarily slowed down
>because I'm in the process of deprecating and removing code in the Geotk
>code base, to be replaced by SIS dependencies. The replacements and
>tests take some time...
>
>The metadata module is not yet complete, but not far. The main parts to
>port in short term are:
>
> * Tests (especially XML ones)
> * toString() implementations
> * Miscellaneous internal types for XML marshalling of time and units.
>
>After that point, there is two significant blocks that we could add. But
>we may revisit later if we want to provide them in a 0.3 release or
>delay them to another one:
>
> * NetCDF CF-1.5 to ISO 19115 bindings
> * Storage in a simple (the most possible straightforward) database
>
>While the above could be considered as "extra" for a 0.3 release, I feel
>that the metadata module may seems of little use to other peoples
>without them.
>
> Martin
>
