Have at it, Travis and thanks a bunch!
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Travis L Pinney <[email protected]>wrote: > +1 on the CLI. > > Could I integrate this with the shapefile format: > > sis metadata foo.shp > > and have it print out the metadata? > > > Thanks, > Travis > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Sounds great, Martin. > > > > Cheers, > > Chris > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > > Senior Computer Scientist > > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > > Email: [email protected] > > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Martin Desruisseaux <[email protected]> > > Organization: Geomatys > > Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > Date: Thursday, June 6, 2013 12:37 PM > > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: Proposal for a command line interface > > > > >Hello Chris > > > > > >Le 06/06/13 21:24, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) a écrit : > > >> Martin, this makes tons of sense! > > >> > > >> +1. > > >> > > >> Note: we had an issue previously for this, SIS-11 [1], however > > >> that was basically a CLI to expose querying and the Qtree interface. > > >> This was a GSoC 2012 summer project proposal, but in the end, I think > > >> that Charith ended up taking it even though it wasn't accepted for > > >> GSoC 2012. > > >Thank for letting me know. I think that we can find a way to merge the > > >options listed in SIS-11 with the proposal. For example SIS-11 list the > > >"-georss" option, which could become "--format georss" in the new > > >proposal. The "-d" (for distance) and "-radius" options may need more > > >though, since I would like to wider the scope to map projections. Maybe > > >we could revisit those later options after the sis-referencing module is > > >in. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Martin > > > > > > > >
