+1 on the CLI. On Jun 7, 2013, at 6:20 AM, Adam Estrada <[email protected]> wrote:
> Have at it, Travis and thanks a bunch! > > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Travis L Pinney > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> +1 on the CLI. >> >> Could I integrate this with the shapefile format: >> >> sis metadata foo.shp >> >> and have it print out the metadata? >> >> >> Thanks, >> Travis >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Sounds great, Martin. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Chris >>> >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. >>> Senior Computer Scientist >>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA >>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 >>> Email: [email protected] >>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department >>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Martin Desruisseaux <[email protected]> >>> Organization: Geomatys >>> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> Date: Thursday, June 6, 2013 12:37 PM >>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: Proposal for a command line interface >>> >>>> Hello Chris >>>> >>>> Le 06/06/13 21:24, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) a écrit : >>>>> Martin, this makes tons of sense! >>>>> >>>>> +1. >>>>> >>>>> Note: we had an issue previously for this, SIS-11 [1], however >>>>> that was basically a CLI to expose querying and the Qtree interface. >>>>> This was a GSoC 2012 summer project proposal, but in the end, I think >>>>> that Charith ended up taking it even though it wasn't accepted for >>>>> GSoC 2012. >>>> Thank for letting me know. I think that we can find a way to merge the >>>> options listed in SIS-11 with the proposal. For example SIS-11 list the >>>> "-georss" option, which could become "--format georss" in the new >>>> proposal. The "-d" (for distance) and "-radius" options may need more >>>> though, since I would like to wider the scope to map projections. Maybe >>>> we could revisit those later options after the sis-referencing module is >>>> in. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Martin >>>> >>> >>> >>
