Btw JSR 363 is not under revision.
It's Final since 2016.

A follow-up version 2, JSR 385 is in development.

Regards,
Werner

Bruno P. Kinoshita <[email protected]> schrieb am Mo., 25.
Juni 2018, 04:02:

> Took me a bit longer than expected to be able to read and vote, but just
> did it. Voted +1 on both, plus a tweet to call others to vote
> https://twitter.com/kinow/status/1011066224694865921
>
>
> Thanks Martin!
>
> Bruno
>
> ________________________________
> From: Martin Desruisseaux <[email protected]>
> To: Apache SIS <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, 19 June 2018 10:11 PM
> Subject: Re: On algebraic properties of units of measurement
>
>
>
> Discussion in "Unit of Measurement API" has shifted on more mathematical
> ground, which is a big win. I tried to summarize the agreement that I
> want to achieve in this page:
>
>
> https://github.com/unitsofmeasurement/unit-api/wiki/Arithmetic-operations-on-Quantity
>
> The message I'm fighting for is that whatever JSR-385 do, the arithmetic
> operations on quantities (+, -, *, /) must be consistent with arithmetic
> laws (associativity, commutativity, etc.). I'm not arguing for any
> particular solution - only for the requirement to be compliant with
> arithmetic laws. Thankfully yesterday discussion seems to have shifted
> to an acceptance of this requirement, but if any one agree, votes (with
> a "thumb up") on the following issues are still helpful:
>
> * https://github.com/unitsofmeasurement/unit-api/issues/98
> * https://github.com/unitsofmeasurement/unit-api/issues/99
>
> Thanks
>
>
>     Martin
>

Reply via email to