Ceki Gulcu skrev:

As in revision 1325, the mention of logback is quiet discreet. I will not bend backwards and avoid mentioning logback just to prove that SLF4J provides a neutral playing field. I do not wish to start a debate about morality.

BTW, have you actually looked at 1325?

I read it.

Have you read what _I_ say? I think it is fine that you mention and promote logback. I just think you should be clear and say WHY :-) Your readers are intelligent - so I'm sure they'll understand :)

--
 Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen  "...plus... Tubular Bells!"

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@slf4j.org
http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to