Ceki Gulcu skrev:
Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen wrote:
Have you read what _I_ say? I think it is fine that you mention and
promote logback. I just think you should be clear and say WHY :-)
Your readers are intelligent - so I'm sure they'll understand :)
Logback is mentioned like other bindings but how is logback being
promoted?
"Thus, using SLF4J in conjunction with logback involves strictly zero
memory and computational overhead."
Which you put back in. I know that you state a fact, but it is a fact
that in this context implies a lot.
I'll give it a shot at a rewrite :)
--
Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen "...plus... Tubular Bells!"
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@slf4j.org
http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
