http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31
--- Comment #59 from Ralph Goers <rgo...@apache.org> 2009-11-15 01:42:07 --- And I will reiterate that adding the support to LoggerWrapper as I did on my fork is the proper compromise. Those who want the support obviously are OK with Java 5 which slf4j-ext requires and should have no problem using XLogger instead of Logger. The fact that it doesn't handle throwable as #70 requests is a separate issue. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@slf4j.org http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
