http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31
--- Comment #66 from boci <boci.b...@gmail.com> 2009-11-16 11:11:12 --- (In reply to comment #65) > Janos (boci.b...@gmail.com), > > Even if everyone on the planet was using JDK 1.7, SLF4J would still need to > ensure binary compatibility with previous versions. > > If in project P you have dependency D1 using slf4j 1.5 and dependency D2 using > the newest coolest versions of slf4j, say 1.6, then for D1 and D2 to cohabit, > slf4j versions 1.5 and 1.6 need to be binary compatible. It has little to do > with the JDK version actually. Before writing that you disagree, read this > over > until you change your mind. > Umm, ok i'm wrong (I try to tell you what I mean when i say "binary compatible not required". If you change to Object[] to Object... it's transparent modification. It's "Binary compatible" (old application which use Object[] can work without any binary(!)/source modification) but not "Java backward compatible" (java 1.4 application can't use the new coolest slf4j version because it's binary incompatible(!) (1.5 required)). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@slf4j.org http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
