http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31
--- Comment #64 from boci <boci.b...@gmail.com> 2009-11-16 09:38:18 --- (In reply to comment #62) > (In reply to comment #58) > > > Disagree. Runtime compatibility is not required. Java 1.4 is dead. I think > > only > > bugfix release need for 1.4 compatible slf4j. > > Just for the record. Our primary deployment platform is AS/400 (or whatever > IBM chose to call it this week), where Java 1.4 is the default JVM so our > installations need to be 1.4 compliant. It is nontrivial to have another > version installed so we have opted to keep 1.4 compatible until OS/400 V5R4 is > EOL'led. > > Please be aware that slf4j serves many people with many different needs, and > that Java is the new Cobol. Literally :) > Some place we using IBM machines with AIX, it's support Java 1.6.... if some people have win 3.1, java need to be support? no. Use older version of java. Same with slf4j and any other libraries. Please do not block the new features development! If you want to use 1.4 java, use slf4j 1.5.x, that's all. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.slf4j.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@slf4j.org http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
