Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >> Felix Meschberger wrote: >>> IIRC we once discussed dropping the Fake* classes ? >>> >>> Wouldn't be about time to do that ? >>> >> Yepp, right - should we simply drop them now? >> (I think yes, they don't provide any value) >> > Hmm it doesn't seem to be that easy....as the fake node is used inside > the StarResource to determine the resource type...which seems a little > bit strange to me... > In fact this causes for trouble as we pass the fake node to possibly registered jcr resource type providers. As soon as they call any method other the two supported methods of the fake node, we might get NPE's and whatnot.
So I strongly suggest we remove this. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [email protected]
