On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[email protected]> wrote: > ...I think we should go with Felix suggestion (which I think we already > suggested some months ago) and provide a better interface for the > resource type provider...
Agree, that makes sense, so we'd move from a JcrResourceTypeProvider interface to a new ResourceTypeProvider one, that maps a Resource to a path? This would be not be backwards-compatible, so I think we need a vote to remove JcrResourceTypeProvider - but adapting existing implementations would be easy. -Bertrand
