in [1] oliver mentioned the usage of property names in the current implementation:
sling:config-ref sling:config-collection-inherit sling:config-property-inherit should we use headless camel case instead? is this more consistent with the other parts of sling? sling:configRef sling:configCollectionInherit sling:configPropertyInherit stefan [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/eed70b8c06e15ee113b76d6d8827dee984a86e00691b2a9990af1144@%3Cdev.sling.apache.org%3E
