I would also prefer camelcase.
See other places in Sling like
> On 14 Oct 2016, at 13:04, Carsten Ziegeler <cziege...@apache.org> wrote:
> Stefan Seifert wrote
>> in  oliver mentioned the usage of property names in the current
>> should we use headless camel case instead? is this more consistent with the
>> other parts of sling?
> As mentioned as a response to Olli camel case would be more consistent.
> So if it is not too much work, we should change it. Otherwise I think it
> is not that important.
> Carsten Ziegeler
> Adobe Research Switzerland