Hi Justin No worries. Also, I didn't mean to kill this conversation. My intention was just to add some context.
As I wrote, I see value in having the possibility to amend the whitelist without losing entries managed by another entity. Regards Julian On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Justin Edelson <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry, I missed that mail. Thanks for clearing that up. > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 1:24 PM Julian Sedding <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Justin >> >> I asked the same question before[0] and Carsten seemed to be opposed. >> >> However, after using it a little, I believe it would much better to >> have amendments (or factory configs). This allows for better re-use >> and modularisation. With modularisation in this case I mean Sling, >> products built on top of Sling, additional provisioning for >> integration-test scenarios etc. >> >> Regards >> Julian >> >> [0] http://markmail.org/thread/tj6gmtxfuk7jdeq2 >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Justin Edelson >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Currently, the LoginAdminWhitelist has a single central configuration. >> I'm >> > wondering if this is really sustainable or if we need some kind of >> > amendment support like we have for service users? >> > >> > Regards, >> > Justin >>
