No worries. Also, I didn't mean to kill this conversation. My
intention was just to add some context.
As I wrote, I see value in having the possibility to amend the
whitelist without losing entries managed by another entity.
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Justin Edelson
> Sorry, I missed that mail. Thanks for clearing that up.
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 1:24 PM Julian Sedding <jsedd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Justin
>> I asked the same question before and Carsten seemed to be opposed.
>> However, after using it a little, I believe it would much better to
>> have amendments (or factory configs). This allows for better re-use
>> and modularisation. With modularisation in this case I mean Sling,
>> products built on top of Sling, additional provisioning for
>> integration-test scenarios etc.
>>  http://markmail.org/thread/tj6gmtxfuk7jdeq2
>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Justin Edelson
>> <jus...@justinedelson.com> wrote:
>> > Currently, the LoginAdminWhitelist has a single central configuration.
>> > wondering if this is really sustainable or if we need some kind of
>> > amendment support like we have for service users?
>> > Regards,
>> > Justin