> On 14 Mar 2017, at 14:11, Stefan Seifert <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> please give [2] as short review from the API perspective. >> >> I just did it. Basically it looks good, but I would be in favour of reusing >> the Resource interface from Sling API. > > uh, this would open a can of worms because we would have to support all of it > including ResourceResolver etc. or we leave a lot of methods throwing > exceptions or returning null which would not be nice either. Most of the developers are familiar with that interface, and since 80% of the methods also make sense for "offline" resources (https://sling.apache.org/documentation/the-sling-engine/resources.html#what-is-a-resource) I think that would be the lesser of the two evils. > > stefan >
- [contentparser] API for simple content representation Stefan Seifert
- Re: [contentparser] API for simple content repres... Konrad Windszus
- RE: [contentparser] API for simple content re... Stefan Seifert
- Re: [contentparser] API for simple conten... Konrad Windszus
- Re: [contentparser] API for simple co... Robert Munteanu
- Re: [contentparser] API for simple conten... Bertrand Delacretaz
- RE: [contentparser] API for simple co... Stefan Seifert
- Re: [contentparser] API for simp... Carsten Ziegeler
- RE: [contentparser] API for ... Stefan Seifert
- Re: [contentparser] API ... Carsten Ziegeler
- RE: [contentparser] API ... Stefan Seifert
- Re: [contentparser] API ... Carsten Ziegeler
- RE: [contentparser] API ... Stefan Seifert
- Re: [contentparser] API ... Carsten Ziegeler
