On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Konrad Windszus <[email protected]> wrote: >> ..."Sling Reference Distribution".... > > I like that, and the frontpage of that distribution can specify that > for most uses people will want to customize the provisioning model.
Hm, in that case, wouldn't it be better to just call it: "Sling Base" (or possibly, "Sling Base Distribution") I'm terrible with naming so YMMV - but, to me that would make it clear that I'm getting the minimum and are supposed to extend it... regards, Karl > -Bertrand -- Karl Pauls [email protected]
