On Wednesday 04 October 2017 09:42:44 Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > I like Starter as well (and agree that quickstart would be nice but we > shouldn't use it due to the mentioned problems) > > So this would be Sling Starter as the basic name, Sling Starter > Application for our jar and Sling Starter Web Application.
+1, or Sling Starter *Standalone* Application (we have named the self-runnable JAR *Standalone* in the past)? O. > Sounds good to me. > > Regards > > Carsten > > > Robert Munteanu wrote > > > On Wed, 2017-10-04 at 00:43 +0200, Karl Pauls wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz > >> > >> <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > >>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Konrad Windszus <konra...@gmx.de> > >>> > >>> wrote: > >>>> ..."Sling Reference Distribution".... > >>> > >>> I like that, and the frontpage of that distribution can specify > >>> that > >>> for most uses people will want to customize the provisioning model. > >> > >> Hm, in that case, wouldn't it be better to just call it: > >> > >> "Sling Base" (or possibly, "Sling Base Distribution") > >> > >> I'm terrible with naming so YMMV - but, to me that would make it > >> clear > >> that I'm getting the minimum and are supposed to extend it... > > > > We already have 'Sling Distribution' [1] and this would make things > > confusing IMO. > > > > I think Eugen made some good suggestions in his reply: > > > > - bootstrap ( although also a bit overloaded due to [2] ) > > - loader > > - starter > > > > Out of these starter looks good to me - it really is a 'starter' as it > > both: > > > > - works as an appetizer for all things Sling, before you really get > > your hands dirty > > - allows you to start quickly with Sling > > > > I would even suggest Sling Quick-Start, but that's again overloaded due > > to AEM. > > > > Robert > > > > [1]: https://sling.apache.org/documentation/bundles/content-distributio > > n.html > > [2]: http://getbootstrap.com/
