On Wed, 2017-10-04 at 00:43 +0200, Karl Pauls wrote: > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Konrad Windszus <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > ..."Sling Reference Distribution".... > > > > I like that, and the frontpage of that distribution can specify > > that > > for most uses people will want to customize the provisioning model. > > Hm, in that case, wouldn't it be better to just call it: > > "Sling Base" (or possibly, "Sling Base Distribution") > > I'm terrible with naming so YMMV - but, to me that would make it > clear > that I'm getting the minimum and are supposed to extend it...
We already have 'Sling Distribution' [1] and this would make things confusing IMO. I think Eugen made some good suggestions in his reply: - bootstrap ( although also a bit overloaded due to [2] ) - loader - starter Out of these starter looks good to me - it really is a 'starter' as it both: - works as an appetizer for all things Sling, before you really get your hands dirty - allows you to start quickly with Sling I would even suggest Sling Quick-Start, but that's again overloaded due to AEM. Robert [1]: https://sling.apache.org/documentation/bundles/content-distributio n.html [2]: http://getbootstrap.com/
