+1, thanks for volunteering.

On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 11:02 PM Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> That makes sense to me I think.  Each month anyone can volunteer to
> run things, and they can pick a time that works for their local TZ.
> If no one in particular has volunteered, I'm happy to host-by-default.
>
> I'll host the first one to get things started.  I'm traveling next
> week, but how about the following Monday (February 6th) at, say, noon
> ET?
>
> Jason
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 3:39 PM Houston Putman <hous...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is a great idea Jason!
> >
> > As per Jan's suggestion, I think it would be great for the host to pick a
> > time in their time zone, so that no one feels pressured. There's enough
> > community members around the globe to not stick to the US
> > timezones religiously.
> >
> > - Houston
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 6:12 AM Eric Pugh <ep...@opensourceconnections.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 Let’s do it.
> > >
> > > > On Jan 24, 2023, at 11:24 AM, David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > We already have a precedent of using Confluence for meeting notes.
> > > Here's
> > > > the last one:
> > > >
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/2022-05-10+Meeting+notes
> > > >
> > > > An email that occurs per meeting would be good to remind folks that
> > > there's
> > > > about to be another meeting within a day or two, say.  It should include
> > > a
> > > > link to this Confluence doc.  I don't think a post-meeting email is
> > > > necessary, unlike the previous meetings I've done.  Ideally the host
> > > > updates the doc to mention some topics discussed and some attendees but 
> > > > I
> > > > could understand if the new low-formality approach means this may not
> > > > happen.
> > > >
> > > > ~ David Smiley
> > > > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
> > > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 11:13 AM Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Awesome - sounds there's definitely some general interest. (Though the
> > > >> details need some hashing out.)
> > > >>
> > > >>> I'm wondering if bi-weekly is a bit ambitious?
> > > >>
> > > >> It might be.  Maybe monthly is a better starting point.  My hope was
> > > >> that making the meetings reasonably frequent would cut down on the
> > > >> pressure folks might feel to show up to any particular meeting.  But
> > > >> maybe bi-weekly is ambitious to start.  Let's say "monthly" then.
> > > >>
> > > >>> Who will host them all?
> > > >>
> > > >> I'm happy to volunteer, since I brought it up.  In my mind that'd
> > > >> mostly involve (1) setting up a Zoom or Google Hangouts meeting, (2)
> > > >> sending a reminder email here a few days in advance with a video
> > > >> conferencing link, and then (3) opening up the meeting when the time
> > > >> comes.
> > > >>
> > > >>> Do you have experience with "no-agenda" meetings elsewhere?
> > > >>
> > > >> I guess?  I've worked at a few places now where the search team holds
> > > >> some form of "office hours" where folks might come with some PR
> > > >> needing review or some question to discuss, or they might show up
> > > >> "empty handed" just to hang out and learn from the discussions that
> > > >> others are having.  And, even less formally, I'd point to the sort of
> > > >> informal hallway conversations that we all have when we have with our
> > > >> coworkers at work, or others in the community at conferences.  Those
> > > >> were the two models that I guess I had in mind.
> > > >>
> > > >> That said - I appreciate how not having an agenda to advertise in
> > > >> advance makes it harder for folks deciding how to use their time.  If
> > > >> folks prefer having a loose list of topics, let's do that.  If the
> > > >> host sends out a reminder email a few days in advance, people planning
> > > >> to attend could advertise their suggested topic on that thread?  Or a
> > > >> Google sheet or Confluence or anything else would work too.  No real
> > > >> opinion on that.
> > > >>
> > > >> Best,
> > > >>
> > > >> Jason
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 6:01 AM Noble Paul <noble.p...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Even if we can get together once a month, that should be great.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Let's keep a google sheets to fill up items that we need to discuss .
> > > We
> > > >>> can just pick up the top items to discuss?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 9:17 PM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Kudos for the initiative. Light-weight is always good, and high
> > > >> frequency
> > > >>>> makes it more light weight..
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I'm wondering if bi-weekly is a bit ambitious? Who will host them 
> > > >>>> all?
> > > >>>> While no agenda is low-maintenance, it also makes it hard for
> > > community
> > > >>>> members to choose which meetings they want to attend if they need to
> > > >> pick
> > > >>>> just a few? Do you have experience with "no-agenda" meetings
> > > elsewhere?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Being a large distributed community, it would also be nice to spread
> > > >> the
> > > >>>> meetings across differnet week-days and time zones. One natural way 
> > > >>>> to
> > > >> do
> > > >>>> that would be to assign a host for each meeting ahead of time, and 
> > > >>>> let
> > > >> the
> > > >>>> host choose a suitable time in his/her own TZ without feeling they
> > > >> need to
> > > >>>> stay up at night to be "inclusive". Or is the number of U.S. 
> > > >>>> community
> > > >>>> members simply so large that every meeting should at least be within
> > > >> the
> > > >>>> daytime hours of both west- and east coast?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Jan
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> 23. jan. 2023 kl. 20:29 skrev Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com
> > > >>> :
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> What would everyone here think about having some sort of 
> > > >>>>> semi-regular
> > > >>>>> virtual "meetup" for committers/community-members?
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> We've done something similar to this with the "committers meetings"
> > > >>>>> that've been held in the past.  Those work great, but I know David
> > > >> has
> > > >>>>> said they're a lot of work to put together.  I've been wondering
> > > >>>>> whether a more impromptu, less-organized format might support
> > > >>>>> interested folks meeting up more often.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Here's a strawman suggestion to build from: let's set up a standing
> > > >>>>> time when folks could hop on a Google Hangout (Zoom?) every two
> > > >> weeks.
> > > >>>>> There'd be no agenda in-advance - folks could come with a question 
> > > >>>>> or
> > > >>>>> a topic in mind, or just to chat with folks they haven't seen in
> > > >>>>> awhile or to hear what others are working on.  If the group is large
> > > >>>>> enough we could do breakout rooms (or something similar).
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> If there's interest I'd be willing to set up a trial-run with a few
> > > >>>>> folks later this week, say, Thursday at 3 (ET).  Or, alternately, we
> > > >>>>> could refine the idea for a bit and do a trial run in a few weeks.
> > > >>>>> Curious what folks think!
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Best,
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Jason
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> --
> > > >>> -----------------------------------------------------
> > > >>> Noble Paul
> > > >>
> > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > > _______________________
> > > Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 |
> > > http://www.opensourceconnections.com <
> > > http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy <
> > > http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>
> > > Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed <
> > > https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw>
> > >
> > > This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be
> > > Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of
> > > whether attachments are marked as such.
> > >
> > >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org

Reply via email to