Hey all, Thanks for pointing out the changelog issues Jan. Do we think this merits a re-spin in its own right, or is it a "-0" sort of concern?
Best, Jason On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 6:33 PM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm afraid there are changelog issues in RC2 as well > > - There's a file in changelog/unreleased folder. In a release there should > never be any > - The HTML changelog is not re-generated before release > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.10.1-RC2-rev-c135e6335c7158fa26e96b0dc386f825255b47c0/solr/9.10.1/changes/Changes.html#v9.10.1.fixed > - The 9.10.1 section contains a release date 2026-01-08. That date is wrong > by a whole lot. we should not use a date at all for the current release. > > I'm working on some additions to smoke tester in > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-18070 to catch things like this.. > > Jan > > > 15. jan. 2026 kl. 17:46 skrev Rich Bowen <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > On 2026/01/15 15:43:43 Jason Gerlowski wrote: > >> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Solr 9.10.1 > >> [ ] +1 approve > >> [ ] +0 no opinion > >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > >> > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > * Verified signatures and hashes on the following files as per > > https://apache.org/info/verification.html > > - solr-9.10.1-slim.tgz (SHA512, GPG signature) > > - solr-9.10.1-src.tgz (SHA512, GPG signature) > > - solr-9.10.1.tgz (SHA512, GPG signature) > > * Verified LICENSE and NOTICE files > > > > FWIW, the NOTICE files have 2025 dates in them. This is *definitely* not a > > show-stopper, but perhaps something to tweak for next time. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
