Hi

I change my vote to +1, leaving it up to you Jason. I think it is more 
important to get a bugfix release out the door than 100% correct changelog in 
the tarball.

Jan

> 16. jan. 2026 kl. 16:53 skrev Jan Høydahl <[email protected]>:
> 
> I think it’s a -0
> We can patch the online changelog.
> 
> Jan Høydahl
> 
>> 16. jan. 2026 kl. 16:20 skrev Jason Gerlowski <[email protected]>:
>> 
>> Hey all,
>> 
>> Thanks for pointing out the changelog issues Jan.  Do we think this
>> merits a re-spin in its own right, or is it a "-0" sort of concern?
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> Jason
>> 
>>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 6:33 PM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I'm afraid there are changelog issues in RC2 as well
>>> 
>>> - There's a file in changelog/unreleased folder. In a release there should 
>>> never be any
>>> - The HTML changelog is not re-generated before release 
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.10.1-RC2-rev-c135e6335c7158fa26e96b0dc386f825255b47c0/solr/9.10.1/changes/Changes.html#v9.10.1.fixed
>>> - The 9.10.1 section contains a release date 2026-01-08. That date is wrong 
>>> by a whole lot. we should not use a date at all for the current release.
>>> 
>>> I'm working on some additions to smoke tester in 
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-18070 to catch things like this..
>>> 
>>> Jan
>>> 
>>>>> 15. jan. 2026 kl. 17:46 skrev Rich Bowen <[email protected]>:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 2026/01/15 15:43:43 Jason Gerlowski wrote:
>>>>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Solr 9.10.1
>>>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>> 
>>>> * Verified signatures and hashes on the following files as per 
>>>> https://apache.org/info/verification.html
>>>> - solr-9.10.1-slim.tgz (SHA512, GPG signature)
>>>> - solr-9.10.1-src.tgz (SHA512, GPG signature)
>>>> - solr-9.10.1.tgz (SHA512, GPG signature)
>>>> * Verified LICENSE and NOTICE files
>>>> 
>>>> FWIW, the NOTICE files have 2025 dates in them. This is *definitely* not a 
>>>> show-stopper, but perhaps something to tweak for next time.
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to