+1 SUCCESS! [1:03:42.817767] On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 10:15 AM Pierre Salagnac <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1, not binding > > SUCCESS! [0:47:08.218950] > > > > Thanks, > > Pierre > > > > Le dim. 18 janv. 2026 à 21:23, Arrieta, Alejandro < > [email protected]> a écrit : > > > Hello Team, > > > > +1 non binding. > > SUCCESS! [0:41:24.267444] > > > > Kind Regards, > > Alejandro Arrieta > > > > On Sun, Jan 18, 2026 at 4:54 PM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Hi > > > > > > I change my vote to +1, leaving it up to you Jason. I think it is more > > > important to get a bugfix release out the door than 100% correct > > changelog > > > in the tarball. > > > > > > Jan > > > > > > > 16. jan. 2026 kl. 16:53 skrev Jan Høydahl <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > I think it’s a -0 > > > > We can patch the online changelog. > > > > > > > > Jan Høydahl > > > > > > > >> 16. jan. 2026 kl. 16:20 skrev Jason Gerlowski < > [email protected] > > >: > > > >> > > > >> Hey all, > > > >> > > > >> Thanks for pointing out the changelog issues Jan. Do we think this > > > >> merits a re-spin in its own right, or is it a "-0" sort of concern? > > > >> > > > >> Best, > > > >> > > > >> Jason > > > >> > > > >>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 6:33 PM Jan Høydahl <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> I'm afraid there are changelog issues in RC2 as well > > > >>> > > > >>> - There's a file in changelog/unreleased folder. In a release there > > > should never be any > > > >>> - The HTML changelog is not re-generated before release > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.10.1-RC2-rev-c135e6335c7158fa26e96b0dc386f825255b47c0/solr/9.10.1/changes/Changes.html#v9.10.1.fixed > > > >>> - The 9.10.1 section contains a release date 2026-01-08. That date > is > > > wrong by a whole lot. we should not use a date at all for the current > > > release. > > > >>> > > > >>> I'm working on some additions to smoke tester in > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-18070 to catch things like > > > this.. > > > >>> > > > >>> Jan > > > >>> > > > >>>>> 15. jan. 2026 kl. 17:46 skrev Rich Bowen <[email protected]>: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On 2026/01/15 15:43:43 Jason Gerlowski wrote: > > > >>>>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Solr 9.10.1 > > > >>>>> [ ] +1 approve > > > >>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion > > > >>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> +1 (non-binding) > > > >>>> > > > >>>> * Verified signatures and hashes on the following files as per > > > https://apache.org/info/verification.html > > > >>>> - solr-9.10.1-slim.tgz (SHA512, GPG signature) > > > >>>> - solr-9.10.1-src.tgz (SHA512, GPG signature) > > > >>>> - solr-9.10.1.tgz (SHA512, GPG signature) > > > >>>> * Verified LICENSE and NOTICE files > > > >>>> > > > >>>> FWIW, the NOTICE files have 2025 dates in them. This is > *definitely* > > > not a show-stopper, but perhaps something to tweak for next time. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > >> > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > >
