http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3825
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-27 19:11 -------
Subject: Re: Unescaped '#' in rawbody causes havoc
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 06:35:20PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think I' be a lot happier with a more complex rule for rule extraction:
>
> s/^(\w+\s+\w+\s+m?(.)[^\2]+\2)/\1/
Yeah, I tried coming up with something earlier... It's not so easy.
Here's valid stuff not accepted by your RE:
/\//
m{foo}
m(foo)
m[foo]
m[f[o]{2}]
Also, (.) is only required if m is there, if it's optional then you only want
to match / ...
The easiest thing I came up with is to take what is supposed to be an RE, and
shove into eval{} ... Otherwise there's a billion ways to screw around and
make this still not work:
/foo/bar/
for instance.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
