http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3847
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-30 04:40 ------- Sure the tests do what they should do, the problem is with the owner of the list whose policy is not quite right. He is trying to dictate how the RFC should be interpreted, without listening to reason. Cause: dropping <> mail to postmaster Resolution: If you lie, accept the e-mail then silently delete it but not tell us you are deleting, you will get de-listed If you tell us the truth (about silently dropping it) you will never be de- listed. > otherwise we can say that as someone > sends HTML e-mail that is not spam, the > HTML checks should be removed too... Not even close, the test works fine, the person who maintains the data for the test is knowingly blocking the good guys and no one seems to care. If any other RBL started listing the good guys, it would be removed. Why is the RFCI given special treatment to knowingly list good sites that don't spam while everyone looks the other way? If roaringpenguin.com were questionable this would be a non-concern. These people make anti-spam software is that why everyone here is against them? It doesn't matter this was for 1.6 points or 1 million points, if someone knows about a test which is FP�ing I always thought it was right to put the information in front of the devs. And if a RBL that we are using starts to change the way they use their own policy and starts adding the wrong domains, should this not also be put in front of the devs? Matus UHLAR - fantomas, maybe you didn't read that thread, maybe you are friends with RFCI. I had already left this ticket alone when Daniel closed it. I only respond again because my blood is boiling. And if you think the white-hats should follow the rfc's, maybe you need to work in the technical support department for a company where rfc's are enforced, maybe then you will find out how many whitehats don't have a clue what they are doing. Most people who send spam are very well educated and know how to setup their dns and systems better than most of us. They use some nice technology to host their sites on zombies, they know dns better than a lot of us. If rfci were so good at stopping spam, it would have a higher score. Maybe it�s not as helpful as everyone thinks. Since this is the first time I noticed rfci has made a questionable decision like this, I decided it should be brought to our attention as soon as possible. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
