http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3847
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-30 08:32 ------- I don't see this being solved in on sa-dev. If the level of FPs due to RFCI increases, it will be reflected in scores generated by the GA; end users can regenerate or adjust scores as appropriate. The issue as I see it is one of policy - whether it's consistent for RFCI to list sites that drop specific mail from indiscriminate hosts (roaringpenguin.com's dropping null-sender mail directed at read-only accounts, in this case <postmaster>) while not listing sites that drop indiscriminate mail mail from specific hosts (sites that reject all mail to postmaster based on MAPS RBL.) The RFCs are anything but clear on this point, at least from the discussion on RFCI. Regardless, it's up to RFCI to address this policy question; I don't believe it's appropriate for SA-dev to get embroiled in this unnecessarily acrimonious imbroglio. Since the issue is still being actively argued at RFCI and there have been no reported actual false positives due to SA's scoring of DNS_FROM_RFC_POST, I believe it's premature to adjust SA's scoring. By the same token, if someone can show an actual (not hypothetical or projected) false positive due to dropping null-sender mail to a recipient that does not originate mail, I'm sure that would help resolve the policy dispute over at RFCI, provided that civil discourse is welcome there. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
