http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3847
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-30 19:25 ------- Responding to the last paragraph of Loren's comment: The only reason for a "reliability" specifier is to give the perceptron a hint when the actual data is in the noise level -- E.g., if there are no ham hits in the corpus. If rules such as RFCI get a high score because they hit spam that other rules do not and that offsets a high FP rate, that is a differnet issue. The perceptron has all the information it needs to score it. A philosophical question: If RFCI was perfect at hitting otherwise missed spam with no FPs except roaringpenguin.com, and the mail used to score the perceptron had much less than 1 in 2500 mails from roaringpenguin.com, is it correct to let the rule get a very high score? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
