http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3847
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-01 03:15 ------- I agree, my intention was to bring in front of the devs some possible policy issues the maintainer of rfci has going. In the slight chance that the SA devs seen that as wrong (or bad policy), they could make a decision either way, just so they know whats going on. They took the time to check into it, didn't seem to bother them so we can all move on. It's history now, we are filed in bugzilla and if anything in the future happens like this, we can come back here and start over again. If SURBL can have a local whitelist can we get one in place for all rbl tests? I could see this issue being moot if one could whitelist rp.com on our own since I feel they have done nothing wrong. Would it be a bad thing for me to suggest to SA devs to include roaringpenguin.com in this local whitelist if made available? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
