http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3340
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-01 10:40 ------- there's not a lot of consensus, fundamentally. we were talking about this on IRC, and we're thinking the best way to do it is: - lint errors: are output as warn()s - lint warnings: are output as debugs - t/basic_lint.t runs --lint with debugs and treats warnings as test failures that way, "--lint" doesn't complain about trivial stuff like too-long descriptions, but it'll still be a bit of an issue, since the test suite will. agreed that "--check-for-errors" is not good UI. but we're hoping to avoid adding another command line switch, as we have loads already! ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
