http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3340
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-01 16:22 ------- Subject: Re: RFE: --check-for-errors > that way, "--lint" doesn't complain about trivial stuff like too-long > descriptions, but it'll still be a bit of an issue, since the test suite will. How about --lint and --lintwarn or --lint-warn or some such? If you are a rule builder, it would be good to be able to see complaints about things like too-long descriptions. If you are merely a rule user, you probably don't care. Having to run some install test somewhere to check new rules seems like unnecessary pain. Normal --lint would only report actual errors. --lint-warn or whatever it might be called would "lower the reporting level" (whatever that might mean internally) so that it reported both warnings and errors, as the current --lint implementation does. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
