http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3340
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-01 16:43 ------- Subject: Re: RFE: --check-for-errors -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > How about --lint and --lintwarn or --lint-warn or some such? If you are a > rule builder, it would be good to be able to see complaints about things > like too-long descriptions. If you are merely a rule user, you probably > don't care. Having to run some install test somewhere to check new rules > seems like unnecessary pain. > > Normal --lint would only report actual errors. --lint-warn or whatever it > might be called would "lower the reporting level" (whatever that might mean > internally) so that it reported both warnings and errors, as the > current --lint implementation does. Well, we were thinking "--lint" reports errors, "--lint --debug" or "-D - --lint" would report errors and warnings (since warnings would be generated as debug-level messages from --lint). - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFBXeuQQTcbUG5Y7woRAlrFAJ96BZyt9vyc0dQ8JnQ/qpR9pbQjRACfWOKI kodzfZcSmYKajeGhew/rntY= =5gb/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
