http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3917
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-01 15:13 ------- > Just as long as the packets are not fragmented, > might be enough to keep the problem from occuring I'll have to try that. If nothing else, the implied flush that would occur after each call to print may have the same effect as the sleep calls, so breaking it up into half the size that works with the sleep(1) may do the same thing with no sleep delays. It's worth a try. I'll post it as a patch once I've played with a bit more to see what the optimal fragment size is and what kind of sleep delay I can get away with. If you can't wait, look around line 1176 in spamd.raw. There are a number of print $client statements in the different branches of an if ... elsif statement. Each print outputs somethng followed by $msg_resp. I took out the $msg_resp from each of them, then followed the entire if with the code I pasted into comment #29 Or you can wait for patch, which will probably be ready when I can get to it 9 or 10 hours from when I am typing this comment. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
