http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3616
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-11 11:16 ------- I like Scott's suggestion. But it applies to SPF in general, not just neutral SPF records. E.g. a +all should be scored differently than a +ip4, just as a ?all should be scored differently than a ?ip4, and +all should be scored differently than a +ip4... Because it's more ambitious, perhaps a separate bug would be better, as this bug has a fix already *that looks checkinable to me* ? Also regarding Scott's suggestion: Perhaps the following knobs (defined to work on HELO and envelope-from) would be sufficient (with my guesstimate as to good start/likely optimized values - Yes, I'm guessing that a +all match is stronger spamsign than a -all match. <sic>) score SPF_ALL_PASS 2.5 score SPF_ALL_NEUTRAL 1.5 score SPF_ALL_FAIL 2 Perhaps, instead of 3, a single add'l knob would be sufficient: score SPF_ALL 2 Also here's a suggested documentation change (in pseudo-diff syntax) that makes the comment accurately reflect what the SPF specs actually require: in lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/SPF.pm: - # SPF HELO-checking variant. This isn't really SPF at all ;) + # SPF HELO-checking variant. SPF requires this be valid too. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
