http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3549
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-26 22:28 ------- (In reply to comment #17) > I posted this to discuss-uribl the other day, with no response. I must be > missing something as to why this isn't the best (and certainly least effort & > coordination) approach: > > > I don't think I've ever understood why SURBL and URIBL don't use wildcard > entries in their zones. Doing so would eliminate the need for SpamAssassin to > determine what the registered domain is (it could just look up the entire > host.domain), it would be compatible with applications that choose to > determine > the registered domain, and it would allow for SURBL and URIBL to do things > like > list thishost.rm02.net and not thathost.rm02.net at their will. Basically it was a design decision to just list domains as registered by spammers. If subdomain.domain.com is appearing in spams and domain.com is legitimate than they should fix the problems with their abusive users. If subdomain.domain.com is appearing in spams and domain.com belongs to spammers, then it should be blacklisted. This was the policy we collectively came up with for SURBLs. Jeff C. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
