Chris Santerre writes: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2006 10:38 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: easier rule committing? > > > > - (b) more importantly: is this worth doing? Are we likely > > to get more > > > interest in rule development if we do this? > > Well besides being low key so I don't go pissing anyone off, yes I would be > more active directly if it were easier to add rules. Easy...like SARE easy. > ;)
Well, we can't go all the way to how SARE does it. Unfortunately we are an Apache project, and with that comes some responsibilities; such as using SVN version control, for example. > > I think we have general development issues, namely that there are very > > few people left who are actively doing development. Rule > > development is > > important too, but I think "easier" just means "more rules" > > which doesn't > > necessarily help. > > Exactly. Which is why SARE has people responsible for certain rule sets. > IMHO, the way SA should be. Otherwise you end up with overlap and confusion. > Anyone can submit the rules, but one person per 'set' actually adds. > > > I'm tired of constantly discussing how to get more rule > > developers though. > > How do we get more developers in general? > > Hookers and booze? :) I knew there was something I hadn't considered!! --j.
