http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4770
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 01:09 ------- Chris Pollock noticed that the plugin gives less accurate results than the procmail recipe by Karsten M. Self (see links in comment #1), and I've also seen a number of "non-responses" in my own corpus. The procmail recipe uses host(1) with "-R 10" (ten retries upon failure) which is pretty aggressive but gives more accurate results. One possible solution is to set up a local mirror of the asn.routeviews.org zone using the data from ftp://ftp.routeviews.org/dnszones/. However this data is not available through rsync (which increases bandwidth) and only in BIND format (which results in enormous memory consumption). [I just asked them if they would offer them.] The second possible solution is to not use SA's check_rbl_text() but do direct queries from within the plugin using Net::DNS with appropriate retries etc. Would that be acceptable? Is it necessary to do async lookups or are the plugins themselves called asynchronously? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
