http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4770
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-16 03:41 ------- it's not necessary to do async lookups, no. If the addition of a few seconds of latency is acceptable (which it probably will be, IMO), then that may be the best option. +1 I would suggest using our own frontend for Net::DNS, though, Mail::SpamAssassin::DnsResolver -- it works around a Net::DNS bug. 10 retries might be overkill, though ;) (Down the line, there's plenty of time to modify it to use the async lookup infrastructure. that would be a good idea so that the lookup/retry/lookup/retry/... chain can happen in parallel with other rules. not urgent though.) Also, it'd be great if asn.routeviews.org was rsyncable -- I'm sure there'd be a lot of people willing to set up mirrors, too... that would be a good way to get the zone usable for internet-scale lookups without hammering that guy's personal infrastructure. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
