http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4770
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #3789 is|0 |1
obsolete| |
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-18 09:11 -------
Created an attachment (id=3790)
--> (http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=3790&action=view)
Plugin to add _ASN_ and _ASNCIDR_ tags (revised 4)
* Use of $scanner->{relays_untrusted} to determine the IP address to look up,
skipping {private_ip}'s (comment #13)
* Add multiple responses (more/less specific networks) to _ASNCIDR_,
space-separated (comment #18)
Regarding load on routeviews.org infrastructure (comment #15): I received an
answer from the project and we are discussing the potential load implication.
There are in fact three nameservers, but they are inconsistently advertised
through DNS. I'll update here as soon as I have more information.
What is your guesstimate: How much load (eg queries/day) would a
white-/blacklist receive if it were added to SA and enabled by default? If it
were included, but disabled?
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
