Doc Schneider wrote: > Sidney Markowitz wrote: >> Justin Mason wrote, On 24/4/07 12:24 AM: >>> Hey all -- I think the win32 stuff is looking good now, so here's an >>> rc3 proposal. Shout if you think it's premature, but I think we're >>> ready for it. Hopefully this'll be the last rc, then we can put >>> out 3.2.0 as a full release... >> There is one more issue I see in both win32 and cygwin: I'm getting >> failures in dnsbl.t and dnsbl_sc_meta.t which I've tracked down to only >> one of all the backgrounded queries coming back with a reply. When I do >> a simple spamassassin -D dns -t < sample-nonspam.txt I see no background >> queries returning with the default rbl_timeout. When I increase it to 60 >> as in the dns tests, I get a variable number returning between 2 and 15 >> or so. >> >> I thought this might have something to do with the high latency or >> perhaps packet loss on my satellite Internet connection, but I see no >> such problems running under Mac OS 10.4.9. >> >> Can anyone please see if the dnsbl tests work at all under win32 or >> cygwin? Is this enough to block the rc release? >> >> By the way, in checking this out I noticed that AsyncLoop.pm has a >> timeout after a hardcoded 20 one-second repetitions of no change in the >> number of background queries. That was causing the tests I was doing to >> time out after 20 seconds rather than the 60 I had set rbl_timeout to. >> Do we want that hardcoded or should it be a config option? >> >> -- sidney > > I'm also seeing dnsbl.t failing and this is on CentOS 5. I just am > walking through my servers testing this new RC. > > Here's the details: > > t/dnsbl..................... Not found: P_7 = > <dns:134.88.73.210.sb.dnsbltest.spamassassin.org?type=TXT> > # Failed test 2 in t/SATest.pm at line 633 > Not found: P_17 = DNSBL_SB_FLOAT > # Failed test 9 in t/SATest.pm at line 633 fail #2 > Not found: P_18 = DNSBL_SB_STR > # Failed test 10 in t/SATest.pm at line 633 fail #3 > Not found: P_16 = DNSBL_SB_TIME > # Failed test 11 in t/SATest.pm at line 633 fail #4 > Not found: P_14 = DNSBL_TXT_RE > # Failed test 17 in t/SATest.pm at line 633 fail #5 > Output can be examined in: log/d.dns/1 > t/dnsbl.....................FAILED tests 2, 9-11, 17 > Failed 5/23 tests, 78.26% okay > > it is still in the process of testing here. >
CentOS 5.0 Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- t/dnsbl.t 23 5 21.74% 2 9-11 17 t/spf.t 106 36 33.96% 1-12 15-18 27-42 45-48 17 tests skipped. Failed 2/129 test scripts, 98.45% okay. 41/2122 subtests failed, 98.07% okay. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 I made sure Mail::SPF was up to date and it is, as well as Net::DNS is up tp date. Now this is on CentOS 4.4 All tests successful, 17 tests skipped. Files=129, Tests=2122, 607 wallclock secs (309.10 cusr + 27.95 csys = 337.05 CPU) Not sure what is happening on the 5.0 box but could be since I had just done an upgrade of it that could explain why some stuff on it is failing? ::shrug:: I'm off to take my wife to the Doctor. (she has an appointment) -- -Doc Penguins: Do it on the ice. 8:44am up 4 days, 16:55, 17 users, load average: 0.18, 0.30, 0.37 SARE HQ http://www.rulesemporium.com/
