Warren Togami writes: > Doc Schneider wrote: > > I'm also seeing dnsbl.t failing and this is on CentOS 5. I just am > > walking through my servers testing this new RC. > > > > Here's the details: > > > > t/dnsbl..................... Not found: P_7 = > > <dns:134.88.73.210.sb.dnsbltest.spamassassin.org?type=TXT> > > # Failed test 2 in t/SATest.pm at line 633 > > Not found: P_17 = DNSBL_SB_FLOAT > > # Failed test 9 in t/SATest.pm at line 633 fail #2 > > Not found: P_18 = DNSBL_SB_STR > > # Failed test 10 in t/SATest.pm at line 633 fail #3 > > Not found: P_16 = DNSBL_SB_TIME > > # Failed test 11 in t/SATest.pm at line 633 fail #4 > > Not found: P_14 = DNSBL_TXT_RE > > # Failed test 17 in t/SATest.pm at line 633 fail #5 > > Output can be examined in: log/d.dns/1 > > t/dnsbl.....................FAILED tests 2, 9-11, 17 > > Failed 5/23 tests, 78.26% okay > > > > it is still in the process of testing here. > > > > Platform: Fedora 7 x86_64. > perl-5.8.8-15.fc7 > perl-Net-DNS-0.59-2.fc7 > > t/dnsbl....skipped > all skipped: no reason given > > How do I force dnsbl.t to not be skipped? > > Anyhow, I modified dnsbl.t so it would run. I am intermittently seeing > similar failures that Doc is seeing above. 18 out of 20 attempts > succeeded with no failures, but 2/20 attempts had a subset of the above > failures.
Yep -- that is about the going rate for dnsbl.t. The timeouts are tight enough that it always has missed the odd test about that often... --j.
