http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5485
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-05 09:52 ------- > I would like to revert to only triggering the rule if there is reason > to believe that the sender actually uses DKIM. I forgot to comment on that: revert to what? I don't think this has changed, at least not within the SA::Plugin::DKIM (and I doubt it has changed in Mail::DKIM). > I wouldn't mind seeing DKIM_POLICY_SIGNSOME with a non-zero score if there > were explicit DKIM policies published. But the existing Mail::DKIM module > would need to distinguish between no published policy and a default policy > actually published. The DKIM_POLICY_SIGNSOME must not distinguish between a defaulted and an explicit 'sign some' policy. If there is a need for such a distinction, a new rule with a different name must be devised. This may be harder to implement than it appears, because fetching a policy is opaque within a Mail::DKIM perl module, and the SA plugin has no direct access to this information. I doubt it would be worth the effort, at least until the SSP proposal reaches a usable state (which will not happen soon). Until then the only useful source of information is a 'hardcoded policy' for each sender - in a form of SA rules to attribute score points to unverified mail from popular sender domains known to be signing their mail. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
