http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5497
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-06 22:12 ------- > I would like > to see the results of running spamassassin -t -D on a message that should be > autolearned as ham but is not, in a system that has been updated by sa-update. Hey Sidney, I completely understand that, too. Can you define for me what you mean by "should be" autolearned as ham? By _current_ definition of the default SA 3.2 config, I would interpret "should be" as a message that otherwise scores at <= -1.0 without bayes, which, even Justin admits in 5257, is 1.21% of ham. It might take me a while to locate such a highly rare message... Or, do you mean "should be" as in the _old_ definition of a ham? e.g. <= 0.1? That, I imagine, would be much easier. Thanks for the help thus far... ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
