http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5497
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-07 01:32 ------- there's an assumption here that the Bayes subsystem cannot deal with training databases heavily biased in one direction over the other. However, I'm pretty sure this is not correct. The bayes algorithms take this into account, so it should be compensated for just fine. Hence, the small number of ham hit with a -1.0 threshold (about 1.21% of ham mail according to mass-checks, see bug 5257) should be no problem to it. if your site sees a different ham/spam ratio, however, you may want to make a site-specific customisation to increase your autolearn-ham threshold... ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
