http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5497
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-07 01:36 ------- > I don't think that the auto_learn_threshold should ever be blindly set to an > arbitrary number. I might even argue that we should not try to provide a > default > value for the autolearn threshold. > > You can look over a large sample of ham and spam to see what makes sense as > thresholds at your site. Without having to carefully verify every mail you > probably can come up with a pretty good number for a score below which you can > be pretty certain that you hardly ever see spam and another number for a score > above which you never see ham. Then use those numbers. in passing, this was suggested ages ago in bug 1829 as an alternative autolearning algorithm; unfortunately that bug got derailed by random discussion, and was never implemented :( it's a good idea. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
