http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5497
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-08 00:38 ------- (In reply to comment #44) I think it is questionable practice to put a default setting in the distribution and then expect all the users to add custom rules to keep it from failing. When users want to do what you want, they can easily put their custom bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam value into local.cf and add their custom rules. The default setting for bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam should, IMHO, be such that the system at least does some ham auto_learning. My suggestion is to set it back to the old default 0.1 and leave the tinkering with negative values to those that have an actual problem and want to spend effort on it. I don't see any problem at level 0.1 and now have even increased it to 0.2 because we have so many mails from hotmail that all score AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS for an autolearn score of 0.101 (and a final score of -3 or so). I want their taglines learned as ham, not spam, because they else FP the bayes check when a file is sent with little or no message body. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
