http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5497
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-07 08:13 ------- > No, I think that the principle that the Bayes learner is relatively > insensitive to the absolute numbers of ham and spam is correct. The problem > is that it is sensitive to getting non-representative samples. I think my experience is to the contrary. I believe my bayes database has taken a serious accuracy hit as the result of a lower number of autolearned hams from the threshold setting change introduced in 3.2.0. I'd say it's very sensitive, given that the characteristics of what I'm learning and what I'm not have otherwise remain unchanged. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
