http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5497
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-07 10:56 ------- > Problem is that in our case we apparently get no messages below > auto_learn -1.0 at all. Even at 0.1 there are many ham messages > not handed to auto_learn because it is so easy to get above 0.1... You are not alone. See recent topics on the mailing list: - bayes autolearn - nonspam threshold - Bayes problem: very large spam/ham ratio >From Fletcher Mattox: After years of stability, my bayes db is doing poorly. When I first noticed it, it was classifying lots of ham BAYES_99, I cleared the db and started over. Now it finds *very* few ham. [...] The first three lines are the only autolearned ham. That's it. All day. There were thousands of hams which were not learned. Notice the quantum leap between -4.299 and 12 in the score used by auto-learn [...] I have restored the original 0.1 and bayes has started working again for me. I am now auto-learning much more ham than I was yesterday. [...] >From Duane Hill: Therefore, anyone using SA 3.2 who was a prior version without the bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam setting will ultimately have to set the value now to 0.1. I agree the -1 is unrealistically low. I had to force it back to 0.1 too. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
