Random thoughts on frequent re-scoring mass-checks...
If we do more frequent --net mass-checks we may individually run the chance of being blocked by the providers of the (URI)DNSBLs such as Spamhaus.
Has anyone been blocked to date? Probably not given the once a week frequency.
Are the hit-rates of the lists high enough that the results that aren't cached by the use of --reuse low enough to fall under the block triggering level? Either way, I guess we should get around to figuring out a way of caching the non-hits. I'm thinking of a method that assumes you ran the rules (based on the SA version in the message header) unless you've specifically told it you don't run a particular rule.
Should we look at getting zone transfers from the various providers and hosting a copy on the zone that committers could use?
Daryl
