Michael Parker wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Michael Parker wrote:
Maybe we should add a --force-reuse that would ignore any msgs that
can't be reused.
I'm thinking that should be the only option for reuse.
This is how it originally worked, but a large portion of the spam traps
had never been run through SA so it wasn't all that feasible. So I
added in a hack that would swap in and out the regular/reuse configs
depending on if the X-Spam-Status header exists.
Ah, I didn't realize it enabled the checks if no X-Spam-Status header
was present. This is probably what I was recalling when I started this
whole thread.
Are folks now running all their spamtrap mail through SA? Maybe we
should remove it.
I am, but I don't think jm is (I know he was dealing with load issues on
his box). Not sure about anyone else.
Daryl
